And how much more does treatment for cervical cancer cost than a vaccination...
This is so boneheaded... Time to start a campaign that sends invitations to funerals to the health minister, because that is what this will mean - totally avoidable deaths.
Precisely. I don't know the numbers but it seems highly unlikely that the money saved on vaccinations would approach the subsequent costs of cancer treatments that could be avoided.
But that's Mary Harney up and down. She's no friend to women.
Apparently the problem is that they're considering the potential cancer costs to be in a future 20-40 years out, whereas they can save money immediately on not giving it out now.
The question of the precise discount rate for long term investments is a vexed one, as the investment (or lack thereof) in environmentally sustainable practices shows, but I agree.
Her statement was a breathtaking exercise in self justification. The real story is that the HSE were never going to bring this in next year and there are documents circulating saying so. So this is another money saving cut that isn't really.
The HSE want to 'consult with parents.' DAMN THEM! They wouldn't be consulting with anyone if it was a prostate cancer vaccine.
no subject
This is so boneheaded... Time to start a campaign that sends invitations to funerals to the health minister, because that is what this will mean - totally avoidable deaths.
no subject
But that's Mary Harney up and down. She's no friend to women.
no subject
Idiots.
no subject
Idiots!
no subject
no subject
The HSE want to 'consult with parents.' DAMN THEM! They wouldn't be consulting with anyone if it was a prostate cancer vaccine.
no subject
no subject
no subject
You are so fucking right about that.
no subject
Not as good an idea as the vaccine, though.
no subject